When publishing a processing set, how are documents with errors treated?

In the context of publishing a processing set, documents that contain errors are typically assigned a Control Number. This practice serves several important functions. Firstly, the Control Number allows for the tracking and identification of each document within the processing system, even if they have some issues. This ensures that analysts and legal teams can reference these documents easily for further review or correction.

Additionally, by giving documents with errors a Control Number, the system maintains a complete record of all documents processed, showcasing transparency and allowing for audits or later revisions if necessary. This approach also helps to differentiate between documents that require no further action and those in need of attention due to errors, thus supporting efficient workflow management.

The other choices do not accurately reflect standard practices in document processing. Excluding documents from processing or marking them as invalid could hinder the ability to address errors later on. Not assigning a Control Number would remove a crucial layer of accountability and tracking, which is essential in legal contexts. Hence, assigning a Control Number to documents with errors is the most effective way to ensure they are recognized and can be managed appropriately.